Climategate 2.0. More Proof of the Global Warming Scam
on November 25th, 2011 at 1:04 pm
.012% of Greenhouse gases are Man Made. Take That you Alarmist Global Warming Scaremongers.
According to Forbes, the new Climategate email leaks contain a number of internal emails from high ranking global warming scientists that once again show what we have been saying for years.
Man Made global warming is a hoax.
Here are some of the juicier emails. No one is claiming these aren’t for real, although the method being used to expose them is a bit dubious. That being said, the fraud that is being perpetrated on the world here seems to be the bigger issue.
Of course this will likely not make the NBC evening news anytime soon, especially as the UN gets ready for their global warming conference. That wouldn’t help promote green week very well now would it?
They sure make it easy for a journalist too investigate. Too bad they rarely exist at any of the mainstream media outlets.
I think that these quotes from leading global warming scientists speaks for themselves.
”Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these further if necessary,”
“I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run,”
“Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive … there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC,”
“I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,”writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in a newly released email.
“Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”
“The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out” of IPCC reports, writes Jonathan Overpeck, coordinating lead author for the IPCC’s most recent climate assessment.
“I gave up on [Georgia Institute of Technology climate professor] Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she thinks she’s doing, but its not helping the cause,”
“I am not convinced that the “truth” is always worth reaching if it is at the cost of damaged personal relationships.” (Wow not sure you’d get this kind of quote from Einstein or any other real scientist)
If Your In The Green Areas, You Will Eventually Be "Encouraged" to Move.
So Roanoke County Board of Supervisors? Do you now regret your decision to force a 30% reduction in carbnon emissions for all county residents now?
Do you regret including sustainable development into the comprehensive plan for the county to combat a non-existent global warming issue?
Do you regret the relationship with ICLEI that has helped nudge you into these bad decisions?
It’s not too late. Sever ties with ICLEI, repeal the 30% carbon reduction goal, and re-work your comprehensive plan. You can protect the enviornment without encouraging (herding) people into your ICLEI villages.
We don’t expect much from Charlotte Moore, as she is a shill for this nonsense. But to what purpose do the other 4 members continue this sham? Get real Roanoke county and get out of ICLEI. NOW!
Chip Tarbutton
